Aerodynamic Drag Reduction
![]() |
3/10-Scale Double Stack Container CarsNational Research Council of Canada 30' x 30' Wind TunnelAerodynamic Force Measurements for Cross Winds of 0° to 90° |
Abstract
Fluid dynamics models were employed to quantify the drag implications of two external railcar design features: 1) inter-railcar gags and 2) railcar side posts. The effects of various design modifications on train resistance and fuel usage were evaluated.Objectives
An engineering design study was undertaken to Reduce Aerodynamic Resistance of Well-Type Intermodal Cars. The specific car models evaluated during this project are manufactured by The Greenbrier Companies.Features of Car Design Included in the Study
1) Smooth Side vs. Exposed Side Posts
![]() Rail Car with Smooth Sides |
![]() Rail Car with Exposed Side Struts |
2) Inter-Car Spacing
![]() Husky Stack Well-Type Intermodal Car |
![]() Maxi Stack Well-Type Intermodal Car |
Approach
- Utilize Wind Tunnel Tests and CFD Models to Quantify Drag Effects of Design Modifications
- Evaluate Effect of Drag Reductions on Train Fuel Consumption using Association of American Railroads (AAR) AERO Program
Wind Tunnel Testing![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 3/10-Scale Well-Car Wind Tunnel Tests |
CFD Modeling![]() ![]() ![]() CFD Results of Smooth and Exposed Side Strut Cars |
Simulation Results
Surface Pressures![]() Smooth Side ![]() Exposed Side Struts ![]() |
Velocities![]() Smooth Side Detail of Flow at Side Post ![]() Exposed Side Struts Drag Area Results ![]() |
Results and Conclusions
Drag
Drag Area for 5-unit Maxi-Stack I Railcar
Fuel Consumption
- Fuel Consumption per 1,000 Miles for Intermodal Train:
- 5 Locomotives, Twenty 5-Unit Well Cars (200 48’ Containers)
- Total Train Weight: 15,942,000 pounds

Effect of Gap

Effect of Gap on Drag Area
All content is copyright 1975-2010 Airflow Sciences Corporation. Do not use without express written permission from Airflow Sciences Corporation.

(734) 525-0300
















