StacksImproving Accuracy of Plant Emission Monitors |
![]() |
| At
Gainesville Regional Utilities' Deerhaven Station, cyclonic flow in the
chimney was an occasional issue under certain operating conditions.
During these times, the plant had to modify their operating conditions
to minimize the flow-related problem. GRU contracted Airflow Sciences
Corporation to determine the root cause of the flow problem and develop
a cost-effective design solution. |
|
| Airflow
engineers utilized a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flow model of
the chimney and duct system in the analysis. This model provided a
clear understanding of the flow profiles that set up the cyclonic
non-uniform flow. Model results are shown in Figure 1. At the monitor
location, a highly non-uniform velocity distribution was present. |
|
| The
geometry of the chimney inlet ductwork did not allow the two incoming
flow streams to join uniformly. The result was a biased velocity
profile which sets up the corkscrewing, cyclonic flow in the chimney.
Model results were confirmed via comparison to plant measurements
(relative accuracy test audit, or RATA, data), shown in Figure 2. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| The
model was then used to evaluate a number of design changes to improve
the flow. The final design, installed in the plant in March, 1999,
reduced the cyclonic flow and significantly improved the velocity
profile at the monitor position. Stack test data after the installation
is shown in Figure 3. |
![]() Figure 3. Post Installation Performance - Velocity Profile at Monitor Location |
| Since the installation, the plant has not experienced any issues with the CEMs' accuracy or repeatability due to cyclonic flow. |
|
All content is copyright 1975-2010 Airflow Sciences Corporation. Do not use without express written permission from Airflow Sciences Corporation.

(734) 525-0300



