Electrostatic Precipitators
(ESPs)
| Airflow
Sciences Corporation has been a leader in ESP flow modeling and
testing since 1985. Proper flow through an ESP is critical to
optimal
performance, as evidenced by many case studies including those shown
here. Improper flow can result in high opacity, spiking
during rapping or load changes, unwanted ash buildup, and erosion. ASC has conducted over 75 flow studies involving ESPs, helping dozens of clients to alleviate various concerns. | ![]() | |
![]() | ||
| Problem:
Poor gas flow distribution through the ESP collection plates. High
velocity regions cause particle momentum to overcome electrostatic
forces, resulting in suboptimal capture efficiency. Analysis: Baseline flow model of ESP indicates that current inlet perforated plate design generates non-uniform side-to-side velocities through gas lanes. Lack of outlet perforated plate causes local acceleration in ESP outlet collection field, carrying particulate out. | ||
| Solution: Inlet and outlet plates are redesigned using flow model. Highly uniform flow throughout the ESP is generated. Improvements can be significant. | ![]() | |
![]() |
| Plant | Baseline | After Modeling |
| Southern California Edison Mohave Station Unit 1 & 2 | High opacity causes 240 MW unit derate | 23% reduction in particulate emissions allows increase in load of 150MW per unit |
| Mississippi Power Plant Watson Unit 5 | Opacity at full load 25% | Full load opacity below 5% |
| Essroc Cement Speed Plant Unit 3 | Baseline ESP opacity 14% | Opacity reduced to 7%, pressure loss savings of 5 IWC |
![]() | ASC also conducts field tests of ESP flow uniformity in a cold-flow condition. In most ESPs, the test crew enters the ESP from the top, climbs across the collection plates, and lowers the anemometer down the electrode wires or opzels to measure velocity across inlet and exit faces. | |
![]() | ||
![]() |
| Reducing Particulate Emissions | |
| ASC's field testing group has been quite active lately, performing measurements on a wide range of equipment including pet food dryers, coal pulverizers, electrostatic precipitators (ESPs), and forging Ovens. Since particulate emissions are a major concern at most industrial facilities, many plants are seeking to optimize their particulate capture equipment in a cost-effective manner. Whether the system involves ESPs, filter bags, or inertial separators, the capture efficiency can be significantly influenced by the flow patterns within the system. |
![]() Figure 1. ESP Geometry |
| In a recent test at a coal-fired electric power plant, the goal was to examine flow patters within an ESP (Figure 1) and develop design improvements to enhance ash particle capture. The customer had several concerns: |
![]() Figure 2. Velocity Testing Equipment |
|
| ESP performance was marginal, with opacity (a measure of particulate emissions) running 16-19%. | ||
| Operating so close to their 20% opacity limit occasionally forced the plant to curtail output. | ||
| ESP performance was noted to degrade over time, requiring the unit ti shut down every 50-60 days to wash the ESP. | ||
| ASC's engineers utilized specially designed testing equipment (Figure 2) to measure the flow patters through the ESP under air-only operation. The velocity profile entering the ESP was severely out of industry uniformity standards. Through an iterative process, several geometry modifications were installed and evaluated. A final design was developed that significantly improved the flow distribution. After the unit came back on line, the ESP operated at less that 10% opacity. More importantly, the ESP operated for a full year without any washes. |
| ESP Performance - Before and After Modifications | ||
| Before | After | |
| Inlet Flow Uniformity (RMS Deviation from Avg. Velocity) | 27.8% | 11.9% |
| Full Load Opacity | 16-19% | <10% |
| Unit Derates Due to Opacity | ~10 MW | none |
| ESP Wash Frequency | 50-60 days | 350 days |
| Computational Fluid Dynamic Modeling of Electrostatic Precipitators Presentation | |||
| Authors: Brian J. Dumont, P.E. & Robert Mudry, P.E. Presented at Electric Power 2003, Houston, TX USA, March 5th |
|||
| Outline | |||
| Objectives of Analysis | |||
| Fluid Flow Modeling | |||
| Testing Methods | |||
| Data Comparisons | |||
| Case Studies | |||
| All Case Studies | |||
| Conclusions | |||
| Click here to download a PDF version (1.8 MB) of the full presentation. | |||
| Click here to download a PDF version (1.1 MB) of the corresponding paper. | |||
| ESP Performance Improvement Through CFD Modeling Presentation | |||
| Authors: Robert Mudry, P.E. & Brian J. Dumont, P.E. Presented at the Dec. 11, 2002 PowerGen International |
|||
| Click here to download a PDF version (2.1 MB) of the full presentation. |
| ESP Gas Flow Fundamentals Presentation | |||
| Robert Mudry, P.E. of ASC Presents at the Aug. 12, 2002 ESP/FF Round Table & Exposition, titled "ESP Gas Flow Fundamentals". |
|||
| Outline | |||
| Introduction | |||
| ESP Fluid Flow Basics | |||
| Assessing Flow Characteristics | |||
| ESP Flow Modeling | |||
| Case Studies | |||
| Questions | |||
| Click here to download a PDF version (3.8 MB) of the full presentation. | |||
All content is copyright 1975-2012 Airflow Sciences Corporation. Do not use without express written permission from Airflow Sciences Corporation.

(734) 525-0300








