(734) 525-0300

Thermal Mixing Using CFD Flow Modeling

ASC Patented Flow Mixing Device Tested
Many industrial processes require controlled incoming flow temperatures in order to operate efficiently. ASC has examined a wide range of cases where two flow streams of different temperature merge. The resulting flow stream often contains significant temperature stratification which degrades the performance of downstream equipment. In some instances, this temperature stratification can also be a safety issue.

Coal pulverizers are designed to grind and dry wet coal to a fine powder prior to combustion in a furnace. Hot incoming air provides the thermal energy for drying and also the transport mechanism for the coal size classification and delivery to the furnace. The inlet air temperature is controlled using a tempering air stream, as shown in Figure 1.


CFD flow model with mixing device
Figure 1. Typical pulverizer inlet ductwork,
Airflow Sciences designed a flow mixing device to optimally merge two streams and obtain a resultant stream of more uniform temperature. A key consideration was generating the mixing effect with minimal system pressure loss. ASC's design effort resulted in the issue of U.S. Patent Number 5,463,967.

The ASC mixer was designed using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model. The CFD flow model helps optimize the mixer design for any specific duct system geometry.

Flow Temperature Stratification Before and After Installation of Mixing Device Designed Using CFD Flow Model
Pulverizer Inlet Measurement Before After
Average Temperature 534 degF 573 degF
Minimum Temperature 512 degF 568 degF
Maximum Temperature 574 degF 581 degF
Maximum Delta T 58 degF 13 degF
Table 1. Flow Mixing Device Performance

The ASC mixer was recently installed in a pulverizer inlet duct at ATCO Power's Sheerness Station in Hanna, Alberta, Canada. Plant measurements indicated a large temperature deviation (58 degF) in the pulverizer inlet ductwork.

After installation of the ASC mixer, the temperature profile was re-measured. The temperature deviation was reduced considerably, to 13 degF, with the mixer in place. Results are shown in Table 1 and Figure 2. The additional pressure loss caused by the mixer was barely measurable at 0.1 inches of water.

If you have a process that requires controlled, uniform inlet flow, give us a call to discuss the applicability of the ASC mixer, which was designed using this CFD flow model.

Temperature Profiles
Figure 2. Measured mixer performance at Sheerness

All content is copyright 1975-2010 Airflow Sciences Corporation. Do not use without express written permission from Airflow Sciences Corporation.